The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 |
From: Annando
Date: Mon, 31 Mar 2008 15:29:17 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, Apr 1 2008 6:29 am
Subject: Re: POP vs. IMAP - which should you use?
Hi!
On 21 Mrz., 06:15, Lon247 wrote:
> I'd love to use IMAP for outlook, but it slows everything to a
Not here.
> crawl. > I don't believe it's outlook as I've done the typical things to
I have 25k messages in "all mails" and no performance problems. Why do
> streamline it - disabled add-ins, disabled rss feeds, etc. i'm not > using exchange, purely gmail. i don't really have folders, and use > primarily my inbox and sent folder. even so getting the headers, and > updating the cache can take forever... i had 50-60k emails in my all > mail folder, and 30k in my inbox folder... you have 30k mails in you inbox? Have you ever considered labels? I defined some labels that help me sorting my mails. Mails that are in my inbox are mails that I still want to answer or that I haven't read yet. By now these are 33 mails. All other mails are having labels. > still, it's next to unusable right now. pop seems fine.
Do you ever have considered using thunderbird? I'm using gmail with
> any help would be fantastic.
apple mail, thunderbird and entourage. Thunderbird is the fastest. Entourage is the slowest. Maybe entourage and exchange are using the same codebasis? (Both are made by Microsoft) Michael You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||