Google Groups Home
Help | Sign in
v2.138f pushed as v2x, v2.137c pushed as v2 - No changes
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  5 messages - Collapse all
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
pamela (Google Employee)  
View profile
 More options Nov 24 2008, 12:55 pm
From: "pamela (Google Employee)" <pamela....@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Nov 2008 20:55:19 -0800 (PST)
Local: Mon, Nov 24 2008 12:55 pm
Subject: v2.138f pushed as v2x, v2.137c pushed as v2 - No changes
Hey folks-

We just pushed v2.138f as v2.x and pushed v2.137c to v2. We don't have
version aliasing  implemented, so you'll need to specify the "c"/"f"
if you're hard-coding to those versions for whatever reason.

There were no bug fixes or features fulfilled in the newest version.

The full changelog is available here:
http://code.google.com/p/gmaps-api-issues/wiki/JavascriptMapsAPIChang...
(If the groups interface cuts the link off, just find it in the wiki
tab of the issue tracker).

As always, please discuss anything in the forum that you think may be
a regression and report in the issue tracker if others confirm your
suspicions.

- pamela


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
the1geek  
View profile
 More options Nov 25 2008, 9:20 pm
From: the1geek <the1g...@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Nov 2008 05:20:45 -0800 (PST)
Local: Tues, Nov 25 2008 9:20 pm
Subject: Re: v2.138f pushed as v2x, v2.137c pushed as v2 - No changes
Hey Pamela,

I just checked. v2.x is still v2.137c and v2 = v2.136d.

Happy Thanksgiving in NZ!  I hope the turkey there is as big and
succulent as in the US.

We missed ya here.

~newton

On Nov 23, 8:55 pm, "pamela (Google Employee)" <pamela....@gmail.com>
wrote:


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
pamela (Google Employee)  
View profile
 More options Nov 26 2008, 6:21 am
From: "pamela (Google Employee)" <pamela...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 09:21:22 +1100
Local: Wed, Nov 26 2008 6:21 am
Subject: Re: v2.138f pushed as v2x, v2.137c pushed as v2 - No changes

Hey Newton-
We don't do turkeys in Australia. :)

There was a rollback for a day; it's all back to normal now. Sorry for any
inconvenience caused.

- pamela


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
the1geek  
View profile
 More options Nov 26 2008, 8:54 pm
From: the1geek <the1g...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2008 04:54:59 -0800 (PST)
Local: Wed, Nov 26 2008 8:54 pm
Subject: Re: v2.138f pushed as v2x, v2.137c pushed as v2 - No changes
OK. Happy Emu Day, Pamela!

Since v2.118, I applied elapsed time between the request of GMap API
loader js and the firing of infowindowopen event on the frame-based
test page below, and I've been monitoring the performance of v2.x and
v2 against v2.118 (pre-modularization of GInfoWindow).

http://genes.com/maps/gmap_test.htm

I pay a lot of attention to the quickness of the bubble display
because usually important info are contained in this, and speeding
this up enhances user experience. And, it is very significant for some
mobile devices especially those with javascript execution time
limitation.

The site will load test pages with different versions of the API
loader into an iframe by clicking on the radio buttons. The actual
version number and the elapsed time will be shown in the infowindow
and recorded on the left panel.

It also checks if the issues of content overflowing and the limitation
of infowindow maxWidth have been fixed.

I tested both fresh load and load from cache on IE7 and FF2 on a PC
described below. For fresh load I made sure I cleared the browser
cache before each load.

The results below are in msec recorded from testing done within 1
minute on
WinXP
1.80GHz Pentium 4
1G RAM

Fresh load (browser cache cleared)
=============================
IE7
===
v2.x = v2.138f
6400 msec
5698 msec
5237 msec

v2 = v2.137c
6489 msec
5328 msec
5899 msec

v2.118 = v2.118
4076 msec
4066 msec
4987 msec

FF2
===
v2.x = v2.138f
2373 msec
2464 msec
2313 msec

v2 = v2.137c
2584 msec
2383 msec
2604 msec

v2.118 = v2.118
2343 msec
2174 msec
2473 msec

Load from browser cache
=======================
IE7
===
v2.x = v2.138f
3115 msec
2894 msec
2934 msec

v2 = v2.137c
4387 msec
4186 msec
4186 msec

v2.118 = v2.118
2214 msec
2194 msec
2574 msec

FF2
===
v2.x = v2.138f
2443 msec
2353 msec
2303 msec

v2 = v2.137c
2584 msec
2364 msec
2454 msec

v2.118 = v2.118
2894 msec
2624 msec
2594 msec

In IE, 2.138f is about the same as 2.137c but slower than 2.118,
specially with fresh load.
Generally the same for all in FF and much quicker than in IE.

~newton

On Nov 25, 2:21 pm, "pamela (Google Employee)" <pamela...@gmail.com>
wrote:


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
pamela (Google Employee)  
View profile
 More options Nov 27 2008, 9:20 am
From: "pamela (Google Employee)" <pamela...@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2008 12:20:31 +1100
Local: Thurs, Nov 27 2008 9:20 am
Subject: Re: v2.138f pushed as v2x, v2.137c pushed as v2 - No changes
Hey Newton-

We're aware that that particular situation (a map with an infowindow
opened at start) will have higher latency with our current
modularization scheme. We're currently optimizing for the general
situation of a map that may or may not have various features, but
we're actively looking into "smarter" modularization.

- pamela


    Reply    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google