From: nominal9 <nomin...@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 19:15:02 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Thurs, Jul 24 2008 10:15 am
Subject: Re: Group Bannings
Hello Pottsie:
Thank you for your reply. I disagree with you about censorship. I would not mind at all having a "civil" discussion about our differences of opinion, if you are willing. I will give you one Kudo.... most other editors or sysops that I have tried to have this discussion with, usually just shut me off pre-emptorily (spelling right?). Waht do you think about Gallileo Gallilei.... as to censorschip? James Joyce? Socrates? .... and a whole bunch of others.... nominal9 On Jul 23, 1:24 pm, Pottsie <pottsie...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I'm not exactly sure what your point is, Nom, but as I am the Moderator who wrote that portion of the guidelines, I feel compelled to respond. I asked that that part be inserted into the new guidelines because Gabbydott had assumed (incorrectly) that I had unilaterally banned her from the group last year prior to taking time off from the group. The eternal damnation part was inserted as a tongue in cheek jab at my atheist freinds.
> Though censorship is fraught with perils, at times it is necessary. There is a point at which unlimited free speech becomes a hazard.......as the cliche "Should you be allowed to shout "Fire!" in a crowded theatre?
> If a group determines acceptable standards of behaving (speaking), it is incumbent upon the participants to adhere to those standards or leave the group. That is the way civilization works.....and why civility is demanded of individual.
> If attacking other members of a group is a group norm, whether that group is a newsgroup like Mind's Eye or a nation, then that group has effectively chosen say that the person who can dominate the others gets to chose what is to be the norm.....effectively annihilating itself. The attacker becomes the bully and his mores become the de facto mores of the group.
> My freedom, any freedom, cannot impede on another's freedom........IF I choose to live in a society. If I want to be TOTALLY free, then I have to find someplace where I can live as a hermit, and even THEN I'm not sure there wouldn't be some limits placed on my freedom by the Universe/God (whichever term one chooses to use.)
> Namaste
> Pottsie
> nominal9 <nomin...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> I read your "Updated Guidelines" as to Bannings< Kiekegraig, et al:
> 5. Bannings
> I couldn't help but notice a similarity ... the ETERNAL DAMNATION
> http://groups.google.com/group/epistemology/browse_thread/thread/e716...
> NOMINAL9'S CENSORSHIP HALL OF "SHAME"
> Censors are to Free speech and literature as Kapos are to Prison
> Below is a list... to date... of pretty much the "mangy" censors and
> CENSORING SYSOP......... BRAIN WASHING..........................
> Dave Cunningham........................ Republican
> Richard Whaley............................Republican
> Jim Dellon....................................Political
> ?.................................................Democratic
> ?.................................................Italian
> ?.................................................Agnosticism
> Alex Krislov..................................Books &
> curtisakelly..................................African
> John Barreiro................................Language
> John Linendoll...............................World
> I TELL YA... IF IT WERE UP TO ME..... THESE LOW-LIFE KAPOS AND THEIR
> BUT, IN THE EVENT THAT THE "REVOLUTION" NEVER GETS HERE... IF ANY OF
> But what can be done in the "here and now"?..... Well, just bide my
> NOMINAL9
> I like my line better....... AN ETERNITY IN HELL WITH, LITERALLY,
> nominal9
> "You can't smell the roses while holding your nose!" - Pottsie You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||