Google Groups Home
Help | Sign in
Message from discussion Smart RNA
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
chazwin  
View profile
 More options Jul 22, 4:46 pm
From: chazwin <chazwy...@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 01:46:42 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Tues, Jul 22 2008 4:46 pm
Subject: Re: Smart RNA

On Jul 22, 12:20 am, Pat <PatrickDHarring...@hotmail.com> wrote:

> On Jul 21, 9:56 pm, chazwin <chazwy...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> > Here's one for Ian. He is curious about Pat's ideas on the "purpose"
> > and intentions of RNA.
> > During a conversation about teleology, I was insisting that the
> > universe is basically devoid of purpose, whilst Pat was pointing out
> > his theory that everything is connected by a vast Quantum god, and
> > affects the world with a string theory model, in which He is
> > demonstrated to be Omniscient, omnipresent and omnipotent. It seems
> > that RNA is the main areas in intervention.

> > Some quotes to give you the fell of the discussion:

> > >For all we know, RNA could be using their hosts for experimenting.
> > > Whilst it may sound silly, we know that, at the root level, it's RNA
> > >that's calling the shots.
> > > LOL!!  RNA rules.  And you're living proof.  I couldn't care less
> > > what you think, Chaz.  RNA runs our machinery.

> > I excused myself from the discussion, thinking it to whacky, and
> > wanting to avoid the inevitable insults that were queueing up in my
> > language processor.

>      Rather, to give you one side of it.  Later, of course, Chaz comes
> out with this one:

> "The raison d'etre of the gene is to make an organism that survives."

>      If he wants to have his cake and eat it too, that's fine by me.

Human language is geared towards teleology . That is why there is a
confusion between reason and purpose and between purpose and ends.
There are subtle nuances in context that can make those, that think
the whole of existence is teleological, misinterpret another (either
intentionally or unintentionally).
So I hope I never say what I don't mean - though I might.
Now the same question back to you.
Did you mean that "RNA is calling the shots", or "RNA might be
experimenting on us". Or did you mean to say something else?

Although I have already explained EXACTLY what I meant by raison
d'etre of genes. I will repeat that the "reason" genes survive is due
to the survival of the organisms they represent, and vice versa by the
way. This "reason" is the reason I, and evolutionary science have
noticed. It is not the "reason" or purpose of genes in themselves.

So now, in the interests of balance: let us know what you mean by:

>For all we know, RNA could be using their hosts for experimenting.
> Whilst it may sound silly, we know that, at the root level, it's RNA that's calling the shots.
> LOL!!  RNA rules.  And you're living proof.  I couldn't care less
> what you think, Chaz.  RNA runs our machinery.

Please try to do it in your own words Without resorting to 5 pages of
irrelevant copy&paste.

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2008 Google