Maybe wrote: > On Jul 23, 2:20 pm, "Alan Page" <alp...@spamsucceed.net> wrote: >> "Maybe" wrote... >>> What is the deal with the Wahoo Gazette? We haven't had a new one the >>> whole week. Are there any advanced copies out there? >> They are out there...you might have an old link that isn't any >> good....www.cbs.comhas been replaced with lateshow.cbs.com after the >> http:// stuff.http://lateshow.cbs.com/latenight/lateshow/wahoo/index/php/20080722.p...
>> That is today's Wahoo...check the Archives for the others you've missed. >> They are out there.
> Yep, an old link I guess. Thank you SO much!
> Maybe...happy now!
FYI, cbs.com/lateshow now redirects to the following.
> Maybe was having difficulty with an old link somehow.
> I'm just sayin'.
This is just the sort of thing that led up to MikeMack having such fun at my expense (for not having a link to the Wahoo on my blog). How am I (or anyone else, for that matter) supposed to maintain links to the thing if they keep changing the URL?
I have a feeling they aren't done, either. If you're going to start the URL with "lateshow", that renders* the "lateshow" at the end a bit redundant.
Greg *Spellcheck tried to tell me this isn't a word.
"Greg Evans" wrote... > This is just the sort of thing that led up to MikeMack having > such fun at my expense (for not having a link to the Wahoo on > my blog). How am I (or anyone else, for that matter) supposed > to maintain links to the thing if they keep changing the URL?
It was the CBS people that changed the URLs this time. The LS Webbers had to work hard for a week to make everything line-up correctly again.
> I have a feeling they aren't done, either. If you're going to > start the URL with "lateshow", that renders* the "lateshow" at > the end a bit redundant.
Again...it's the CBS IT Department goons that set the rules.
Alan Page wrote: > "Greg Evans" wrote... >>> This is just the sort of thing that led up to MikeMack >>> having such fun at my expense (for not having a link to >>> the Wahoo on my blog). How am I (or anyone else, for that >>> matter) supposed to maintain links to the thing if they >>> keep changing the URL?
> It was the CBS people that changed the URLs this time. The LS > Webbers had to work hard for a week to make everything line-up > correctly again.
I figured this was the case. Not knowing for sure, I just went with the generic 'they'.
>>> I have a feeling they aren't done, either. If you're going >>> to start the URL with "lateshow", that renders* the >>> "lateshow" at the end a bit redundant.
> Again...it's the CBS IT Department goons that set the rules.
While I'm not a fan of changing URLs all willy-nilly-like, I do think they need to clean them up. "lateshow.cbs.com/latenight/lateshow/whatever" is just ugly and awkward. They should strive for "lateshow.cbs.com/whatever"; much cleaner and nicer.
"Greg Evans" wrote... > While I'm not a fan of changing URLs all willy-nilly-like, I do > think they need to clean them up. > "lateshow.cbs.com/latenight/lateshow/whatever" is just ugly and > awkward. They should strive for > "lateshow.cbs.com/whatever"; > much cleaner and nicer.
Agreed. They have always put "latenight" then "lateshow" or "latelate" depending on one of the 2 latenight shows. Primetime has always followed the .com/ part for the...ah...primetime shows. The same follows for Daytime shows. Most of the CBS sites haven't switched from www.cbs.com beginnings...yet.
