Web Images News Groups Books Scholar Gmail more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Journal article - Commemorating and commodifying the prisoner of war experience in south-east Asia
There are currently too many topics in this group that display first. To make this topic appear first, remove this option from another topic.
There was an error processing your request. Please try again.
flag
  1 message - Collapse all  -  Translate all to Translated (View all originals)
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
Bernard Ong  
View profile  
 More options May 23 2006, 3:25 pm
From: "Bernard Ong" <bernardo...@yahoo.com>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2006 00:25:53 -0700
Local: Tues, May 23 2006 3:25 pm
Subject: Journal article - Commemorating and commodifying the prisoner of war experience in south-east Asia
You may find this article interesting (though very academic), contrary
to what many would typically think about the Changi museum. The entire
article is available at http://www.awm.gov.au/journal/j33/blackburn.htm

Dr Kevin Blackburn is a lecturer at NIE, History department, who was my
lecturer when I studied there.

Changi as "POW Heaven"
{13} The occasions for commemoration of the POW experience at Changi in
the postwar years were not grim affairs at which only the horrors were
remembered. There was a good reason for the ex-POWs not to commemorate
such horrors: atrocities did not occur at Changi. Out of the 87,000
POWs who passed through the camp, only 850 died.

Likewise, Lionel De Rosario, a Eurasian POW who was imprisoned at
Changi and worked on the Burma-Thailand Railway, concluded: "when
compared with the life and working conditions on the Siam-Burma railway
work camps and other camps in the East Indies, Changi Camp was more
like a low budget holiday camp".

"Changi became known as the most notorious camp in Asia, and in the
minds of many people in England, Australia, and America, the Changi
prisoner-of-war camp would invoke visions of atrocities, starvation,
bad living conditions and emaciated men. It was the place where
prisoners-of-war were reduced to a physical state more looking like
living skeletons. As a prisoner-of-war, not only in the Changi Camp but
in various camps in Singapore and Siam [Thailand], I cannot understand
how Changi had earned such a reputation. My memories of Changi have
never been unpleasant. Prisoners-of-war in Changi did suffer
deprivation and loss of self-esteem, but conditions were not appalling.
Although food was rationed, it was provided every day. The camp was
also provided with amenities, such as electric lights and piped water,
which contributed to our cleanliness and good healthy conditions."


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
End of messages
« Back to Discussions « Newer topic     Older topic »

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google