The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.past-films, alt.movies, rec.arts.movies.current-films, alt.cult-movies
From: symphonic...@hotmail.com (choral reef)
Date: 10 Jun 2004 18:18:32 -0700
Local: Fri, Jun 11 2004 9:18 am
Subject: how come we still talk primarily about directors?
some people are more partial to 'auteur theory' than others. some
reject it passionately. yet, all of us still talk of the director as being the primary artistic force behind movies. for instance, like LOR or not, we generally discuss it as the when we like or dislike a ron howard film, we discuss it in terms of whether we like or dislike titanic or attack of the clones all comes i guess 'auteurists' are specifically crediting or blaming the but shouldn't anti-auteurists call this figure a You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||