Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Message from discussion how come we still talk primarily about directors?
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
John Harkness  
View profile  
 More options Jun 13 2004, 1:06 am
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.past-films
From: John Harkness <jhXaYrkne...@sympatico.ca>
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2004 13:06:12 -0400
Local: Sun, Jun 13 2004 1:06 am
Subject: Re: how come we still talk primarily about directors?

On Sat, 12 Jun 2004 16:27:25 GMT, dober...@DROPsocal.rr.com wrote:
>Chris Collins <raisinja...@earthlink.net> wrote:

>>The Cahiers crew succeeded in imprinting it on the popular imagination.

>I think the privileging of directors predates Cahiers. When I watch a
>movie from the 1940s, the director's name is typically the final
>credit, which has pertinent implications in any discussion of the
>public's view of a director's importance.

Plus certain directors were commodities long before Cahiers -- Capra,
Hitchock, John Ford, William Wyler, Huston

John Harkness


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google