Web Images News Groups Books Scholar Gmail more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Message from discussion how come subjective viewpoint cinema doesn't work?
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
choral reef  
View profile  
 More options Jun 11 2004, 12:38 pm
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.past-films, alt.movies, rec.arts.movies.current-films, alt.cult-movies
From: symphonic...@hotmail.com (choral reef)
Date: 10 Jun 2004 21:38:37 -0700
Local: Fri, Jun 11 2004 12:38 pm
Subject: how come subjective viewpoint cinema doesn't work?
of course, most movies use momentary subjective view shots but how
come camera is a poor substitute for extended subjective shots?
how come movies that utilize long subjective take--lady in the
lake--are considered aesthetic failures?

could citizen kane have worked using subjective perspective throughout
as originally planned?

now explain memory flashbacks or dreams. these are meant to be
personally subjective. yet, in most movies we see the person whose
dream or memory it's supposed to be in the dream or memory flashback.
isn't this kinda absurd?
yet, it always works. why?

best use of subjective shot?

goodfellas when the guys in a restaurant greet henry.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google