The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 |
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.past-films
From: dober...@DROPsocal.rr.com
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 05:31:01 GMT
Local: Fri, Jun 11 2004 1:31 pm
Subject: Re: how come we still talk primarily about directors?
symphonic...@hotmail.com (choral reef) wrote: Most of us probably just refer to the director as a metonymic (or >some people are more partial to 'auteur theory' than others. some >reject it passionately. >yet, all of us still talk of the director as being the primary >artistic force behind movies. >for instance, like LOR or not, we generally discuss it as the synecdochic) shortcut; it's for the sake of convenience. >but shouldn't anti-auteurists call this figure a Well, now. . . in a long career of unusual suggestions, you've really >prodiractortographeditorgaffer? outdone yourself there! -- You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| |||||||||||||