|
|
rec.arts.movies.past-films |
> >some people are more partial to 'auteur theory' than others. some > >for instance, like LOR or not, we generally discuss it as the > Most of us probably just refer to the director as a metonymic (or > >but shouldn't anti-auteurists call this figure a > Well, now. . . in a long career of unusual suggestions, you've really dober...@DROPsocal.rr.com wrote in message <news:nlgic0dnmn8au4a76fvg0sdcoh18kleqrf@4ax.com>... but you mus surly know on barry lyndon the gaffer and sound guy was
> symphonic...@hotmail.com (choral reef) wrote:
> >reject it passionately.
> >yet, all of us still talk of the director as being the primary
> >artistic force behind movies.
> >visionary creation of peter jackson. few, if any, have mentioned the
> >writers, editor, cameraman, CGI geeks, etc by name.
> synecdochic) shortcut; it's for the sake of convenience.
maybe replaceable but not kuby.
> >prodiractortographeditorgaffer?
> outdone yourself there!