Gmail Calendar Documents Reader Web more »
Recently Visited Groups | Help | Sign in
Google Groups Home
Message from discussion how come we still talk primarily about directors?
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
 
From:
To:
Cc:
Followup To:
Add Cc | Add Followup-to | Edit Subject
Subject:
Validation:
For verification purposes please type the characters you see in the picture below or the numbers you hear by clicking the accessibility icon. Listen and type the numbers you hear
 
George Peatty  
View profile  
 More options Jun 12 2004, 9:30 am
Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.past-films, alt.movies, rec.arts.movies.current-films, alt.cult-movies
From: George Peatty <pttyg47-1...@copper.net>
Date: Fri, 11 Jun 2004 20:30:41 -0500
Local: Sat, Jun 12 2004 9:30 am
Subject: Re: how come we still talk primarily about directors?

On Fri, 11 Jun 2004 00:03:09 -0400, Heynony <nos...@noway.com> wrote:
>Why not ask who are the top ten auteurists and anti-auteurists in this
>newsgroup?

This whole discussion reminds me of how some look at pro football.  If the team loses,
it's the quarterback's fault; if the team wins, the quarterback gets the praise, the
publicity and the money.  It's not true for football, and it's not true for movies.  I
guess I'm not an auteur.  

    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2009 Google