Newsgroups: rec.arts.movies.past-films, alt.movies, rec.arts.movies.current-films, alt.cult-movies
From: Chris Collins <raisinja...@earthlink.net>
Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2004 13:08:18 GMT
Local: Sat, Jun 12 2004 9:08 pm
Subject: Re: how come we still talk primarily about directors?
In article 7b98c3ee.0406101718.7e268...@posting.google.com, choral reef at
symphonic...@hotmail.com stated: > some people are more partial to 'auteur theory' than others. some The Cahiers crew succeeded in imprinting it on the popular imagination. Or > reject it passionately. > yet, all of us still talk of the director as being the primary > artistic force behind movies. rather the media that has replaced it. What the auteur theory came out of was the sense that film was a processed, The dream of Truffaut especially was to create a cinema as intensely At least that's the impression that I get from 'The 400 Blows.' I think And you know how those Frenchies love their 'theories.' The problem is that film is made with a dark room full of people in mind The power of film is its mass hypnotic effect, somewhat like Hitler's (Television has the same hypnotic power, but stripped of cinema's positive You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.
| ||||||||||||||