Google Groups Home
Help | Sign in
Message from discussion The McMNC for 1991: University of Washington
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
McMahone  
View profile
 More options Jul 24, 11:00 am
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: McMahone <mmcmah...@umhb.edu>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 20:00:21 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Thurs, Jul 24 2008 11:00 am
Subject: Re: The McMNC for 1991: University of Washington
On Jul 23, 2:50 pm, mianderson <clay...@excite.com> wrote:

> 1991 is a complete dead heat.  Two completely equal resumes in just
> about every respect.  To act like one team was definetely better than
> the other or definetely did more is silly......

It isn't that often that I agree with Mia, but he's right here.  The
only way to get this one right is to call it a tie and blame the
system.  There really is no logic in suggesting that one dominant win
is better than another dominant win just because the opponent cared
more in one game than the other.

Marty


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2008 Google