Google Groups Home
Help | Sign in
Message from discussion The McMNC for 1991: University of Washington
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
Tonawanda Kardex  
View profile
 More options Jul 24, 4:36 am
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: Tonawanda Kardex <tonawandakar...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 13:36:04 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Thurs, Jul 24 2008 4:36 am
Subject: Re: The McMNC for 1991: University of Washington
On Jul 23, 12:46 pm, "J.C. Watts Enslin" <jonens...@charter.net>
wrote:

> On Jul 23, 2:40 pm, McMisanthrope <mcmisanthr...@gmail.com> wrote:

> > AP Top 10: Final Record -- Key Bowl Results

> > 1. Miami-FL: 12-0-0 -- W, Orange, 22-0
> > 2. Washington: 12-0-0 -- W, Rose, 34-14
> > 3. Penn State: 11-2-0 -- W, Fiesta, 42-17
> > 4. Florida State: 11-2-0 -- W, Cotton, 10-2
> > 5. Alabama: 11-1-0 -- W, Blockbuster, 30-25
> > 6. Michigan: 10-2-0 -- L, Rose, 14-34
> > 7. Florida: 10-2-0 -- L, Sugar, 28-39
> > 8. California: 10-2-0 -- W, Citrus, 37-13
> > 9. East Carolina: 11-1-0 -- W, Peach, 37-34
> > 10. Iowa: 10-1-1 -- T, Holiday, 13-13

> > Only four teams to consider here: Miami, Washington, Alabama and East
> > Carolina (courtesy?). But the Tide get rolled (heh), because Florida
> > won the SEC and the head-to-head matchup (35-0!).

> > East Carolina had a 48% SOS rating, and their loss was to 6-6 Illinois
> > on the road by a touchdown. They did beat AP #11 Syracuse (10-2) and
> > AP #24 North Carolina State (9-3), however. But they can't overcome
> > the loss with such a low SOS rating.

> > So, obviously, we're down to two unbeaten, untied teams for the 1991
> > McMNC. Let the debate begin ...

> > Miami had a 54% SOS rating, with wins over AP #21 Tulsa (10-2) on the
> > road by 24 points, #3 Penn State at home by six points, unranked 6-5
> > West Virginia by 24 points at home, #4 Florida State on the road by
> > one point (of course!), unranked 8-4-1 San Diego State at home by 27
> > points, and AP #15 Nebraska (9-2-1) in the Orange Bowl. The dogs on
> > their schedule? 0-10-1 Oklahoma State and 2-9 Cal State Long Beach.
> > They beat four ranked teams, including #3 and #4 by a combined seven
> > points. The Hurricanes beat six winning teams in 1991.

> > Washington had a 52% SOS rating, with wins over AP #22 Stanford (8-4)
> > by 35 points on the road, #15 Nebraska on the road by 15 points,
> > unranked 7-4 Kansas State by 53 points at home, #8 California by seven
> > points on the road, unranked 6-5 Arizona State by 28 points at home,
> > and #6 Michigan by 20 points in the Rose Bowl. The schedule dog? 1-10
> > Oregon State. The Huskies, too, beat four ranked teams, including #6
> > and #8 by a combined 27 points. Washington also beat six winning teams
> > in 1991.

> > Common opponents? Nebraska, for starters. Washington's win over
> > Nebraska in Lincoln on September 21 has to be given more significance,
> > since the Huskers were at home and probably believing they had a
> > chance at the national title. By the time the Orange Bowl rolled
> > around, Nebraska knew they had no shot at the championship, especially
> > in Miami's backyard. Another common opponent? Arizona. Miami beat the
> > 4-7 Wildcats by 27 points on the road, while Washington beat them 54-0
> > at home.

> > Miami has the slight SOS edge, but Washington takes the common
> > opponents' edge and the better wins edge (because of dominance in
> > those wins). The Huskies also have a better bowl win, since Miami was
> > at home in the Orange Bowl and playing a lesser team.

> I can't argue with this pick either way.  I would give an edge to
> Washington as well, but I would have loved to see this head-to-head.

> > Miami-FL: -1983, =1987, =1989, =1991

> Uh....did you change your mind?

I'm guessing McMarty made a typo, since the two keys [(-) and (=)] are
right next to each other.

But your panties must be very close to your face right now, huh?


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2008 Google