Google Groups Home
Help | Sign in
Message from discussion The McMNC for 1991: University of Washington
The group you are posting to is a Usenet group. Messages posted to this group will make your email address visible to anyone on the Internet.
Your reply message has not been sent.
Your post was successful
McMisanthrope  
View profile
 More options Jul 24, 12:15 pm
Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college
From: McMisanthrope <mcmisanthr...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 21:15:58 -0700 (PDT)
Local: Thurs, Jul 24 2008 12:15 pm
Subject: Re: The McMNC for 1991: University of Washington
On Jul 23, 8:00 pm, McMahone <mmcmah...@umhb.edu> wrote:

> On Jul 23, 2:50 pm, mianderson <clay...@excite.com> wrote:

> > 1991 is a complete dead heat.  Two completely equal resumes in just
> > about every respect.  To act like one team was definetely better than
> > the other or definetely did more is silly......

> It isn't that often that I agree with Mia, but he's right here.  The
> only way to get this one right is to call it a tie and blame the
> system.  There really is no logic in suggesting that one dominant win
> is better than another dominant win just because the opponent cared
> more in one game than the other.

I guess you two didn't see Michigan beat Florida in the Citrus Bowel
this year, then.

I firmly believe motivation is everything in college sports; ask
Appalachian State.


    Reply to author    Forward  
You must Sign in before you can post messages.
To post a message you must first join this group.
Please update your nickname on the subscription settings page before posting.
You do not have the permission required to post.

Create a group - Google Groups - Google Home - Terms of Service - Privacy Policy
©2008 Google