The McMNC for 1991: University of Washington - rec.sport.football.college

Message from discussion The McMNC for 1991: University of Washington

McMisanthrope

View profile

More options Jul 24, 12:15 pm

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college

From: McMisanthrope <mcmisanthr...@gmail.com>

Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2008 21:15:58 -0700 (PDT)

Local: Thurs, Jul 24 2008 12:15 pm

Subject: Re: The McMNC for 1991: University of Washington

  Reply to author
  |
  Forward
  | Print
  | View thread
  | Show original
  | Report this message
  | Find messages by this author
  

On Jul 23, 8:00 pm, McMahone <mmcmah...@umhb.edu> wrote:

> On Jul 23, 2:50 pm, mianderson <clay...@excite.com> wrote:

> > 1991 is a complete dead heat. Two completely equal resumes in just
> > about every respect. To act like one team was definetely better than
> > the other or definetely did more is silly......

> It isn't that often that I agree with Mia, but he's right here. The
> only way to get this one right is to call it a tie and blame the
> system. There really is no logic in suggesting that one dominant win
> is better than another dominant win just because the opponent cared
> more in one game than the other.

I guess you two didn't see Michigan beat Florida in the Citrus Bowel
this year, then.

I firmly believe motivation is everything in college sports; ask
Appalachian State.

Reply to author Forward