Critical ethics question - rec.sport.football.college

Message from discussion Critical ethics question

John Rogers

View profile

More options Jul 29, 8:41 am

Newsgroups: rec.sport.football.college

From: John Rogers <tiger7...@yahoo.com>

Date: Mon, 28 Jul 2008 20:41:44 -0400

Local: Tues, Jul 29 2008 8:41 am

Subject: Re: Critical ethics question

  Reply to author
  |
  Forward
  | Print
  | View thread
  | Show original
  | Report this message
  | Find messages by this author
  

You're not like the others, jimbrown...@yahoo.com... you like the same
things I do! Wax paper! Boiled football leather! Dog breath!

>On Jul 23, 11:12 pm, rich hammett <bubbaric...@warmmail.com> wrote:
>> Minun olisi pitänyt tietää, olisi pitänyt tietää,
>> olisi pitänyt tietää KUKA SINÄ OLET, John Rogers:

>> > Are the womenz of the WNBA hypocritical when they desire the
>> > credibility and panache that comes along with having former *NBA*
>> > players involved and often coaching in their league... but get all
>> > pissy when one of those former NBA players, when simply trying to
>> > break up the WNBA's first cat-brawl, puts his hands out and pushes a
>> > WNBA player out of the way so she can't get into the fight?

>> Yes, that is hypocritical AND stupid.

>> rich

>Holy shiite. Did Rich just agree with Rogers????

Human sacrifice, dogs and cats living together... mass hysteria!

John Rogers
AU Class of 1985
The Al Del Greco of Atlanta

"Hammer's Slammers have become a vehicle for a message that
I think needs to be more widely known. Veterans who've written
or talked to me already understand, but a lot of other people
don't. When you send a man out with a gun, you create a policy
maker. When his ass is on the line, he will do whatever he needs
to do. And if the implications of that bother you, the time to
do something about it is before you decide to send him out."
(David Drake, Vietnam veteran, author)

Reply to author Forward